[ad_1]
A pioneering group in the field of advocacy has come out through “confusion and broad fear” caused by the Supreme Court ruling that women are defined by biology.
The legal ruling came after years of campaigns from the sexes between the sexes and left the transient community in a state of chaos.
Kiir Starmer has recently transformed his position on transit rights. His spokesman said on Tuesday that the Prime Minister was no longer Secure A mutant woman is a woman – although he said the opposite in 2022 – He said that the government welcomes the ruling.
However, in a new message to the Prime Minister, activists from Interaction He stabbed the government’s repeated claim that the decision of the supreme judges had brought “clarity” and pointed to the 14 case that the ruling did not address.
I asked the message: “How is the” biological sex “unlike the certificate on the original birth certificates? The genitals?
Activists also looked at how women who are not embraced by the court’s decision, especially women who suffer from “the appearance or characteristics of gender.”
The group said: “In the context of early legal analysis, a number of huge risks were identified for all people LGBTQ+, as well as women who suffer from appearance or non -matching features between the sexes, which arises from this deviation from the original intentions and clear definitions in the Equality Law.”
He also asked: “What are the mechanisms available to correct” administrative “errors, such as the recently reported young girl as a sign of M on her original birth certificate in the past fall, or the woman who discovered a few years ago that she was a legal male when she went to marry her long -term partner and her child’s father?”
Then, activists in individual cases were interrogated.
“How will policies such as British police policies (BTP)-who announced that transit women will be searched by male officers-do not create a great danger to all women?
“How will the BTP determine who is the transient and who is not?
The group also looked at issues related to public places after the Minister of Equality and Education, Bridge Philipson, that people should use toilets according to biological sex.
“How can access to one sex spaces?” Activists asked. How will this be funded?
He also asked: “If transit women should be prevented from one sex spaces, and men who cross from female spaces and individual males are prevented, what are the facilities that transit men should use, and how will the woman’s safety and dignity be guaranteed?”
Helen Bilcher, the head of the interrogation, concluded by writing: “We hope that these urgent questions will show that this ruling has brought widely and fear, not clarity, and that the UK’s equality law should immediately return to a sound legal installment.
“There are many other questions that also arise from the ruling that will be followed as a legal study and practical effects continue.”
When the LBC presenter Nick Ferrari asked about the British transport police policy that male officers would now conduct search operations for the ribbon on transit women, the police Minister Diana Johnson was supporting her.
She said: “What I understand from the Supreme Court ruling last week is that it will be on the basis of biological sex … Yes, this is the law of the earth. I support the Law of the Earth.
“I am very pleased that we have this clarity last week regarding biological sex is the basis for it.”
But the leader of the Green Party, Carla Denir, later returned to the government’s response.
“Unfortunately for women, I, no, I did not, not a lot of [our] Rights have been eroded in recent years.
“The discounts in health care, the rise in the hatred of women and January, and the government’s neglect of public services made us all safer and less supportive.
“I am very concerned that the government’s response to the recent Supreme Court will entrench these problems for transformed people, not to do anything to address the real issues facing all women – which makes it difficult for converting people to be in public places, obtain support, or to obtain health care.
“I am also concerned that instead of standing against a wave of hatred and fear directed against converting people, this government gives those who see that transformers have come out of public life.”
