[ad_1]
Harvard University, which was collided with the Trump administration because of its academic independence and withdrawing billions of dollars from research financing, said on Wednesday that its president chose to reduce his salary by 25 percent starting this year.
The university did not reveal details about the president’s compensation package, Alan M. Garper, who became Harvard’s permanent leader last year. The last predecessors were paid about one million dollars a year.
Whatever it is suitable for dollars, though, wage reduction is a symbolic gesture compared to the university’s fighting scale with the federal government, which has already moved to prevent more than $ 2.6 billion in Harvard’s financing.
University spokesman, Jonathan, said. Swin, the salary of Dr. Garper will decrease from July 1, when the next fiscal year will start for Harvard University. The university, which has already suspended the new employment and the suspended entitlement to many employees, said that other Harvard leaders were planning contributions to the school.
The university recognized the decision of Dr. Garper the day following the expansion of a lawsuit against the Trump administration.
The government presented a set of intrusive requirements at Harvard University last month, confirming that the university, among other things, did not do enough to combat anti -Semitism. The university was sharply wrapped in these accusations. Then last week, Linda McMahon, Minister of Education, said that Harvard University will not be eligible for other federal scholarships.
Legal experts have made suspicion of Mrs. McMahon’s decree, and many of them believe that Harvard has a strong legal issue to reverse the discounts of the Trump administration already. However, Harvard University, which routinely received hundreds of millions of dollars annually from financing federal research, is preparing for the turmoil as long as President Trump remains in office.
In the first months of Mr. Trump’s second mandate, Harvard University has already had to expand or eliminate some research programs, including efforts to study tuberculosis, Le George and radiation disease, due to federal financing discounts. The College of Public Health at the University of Chan, which faces some of the most important financing losses, gets rid of desktop phones, reduces food supply, reduces security and reduces the purchases of new computers. The school also reduced the spaces of leased offices, holes for doctoral students and a cruel equivalent to employees between offices.
But Harvard said on Wednesday afternoon that he would try to fill some of the gaps left by the loss of federal funds. In a message to Harvard community, Dr. Garper and John F. said. Manning, Provost, the university will spend at least $ 250 million in the coming fiscal year to support research efforts.
“Although we cannot accommodate the full cost of suspended or canceled federal funds, we will fill in financial resources to support important research activity,” wrote Dr. Garper and Mr. Manning.
The financial leak will complete approximately $ 500 million per year that Harvard was already putting on research projects. (Although Harvard has gifts of about $ 53 billion, much money is restricted and cannot be replaced at the will.)
Qarmazi, the school’s campus newspaper, reported the decision of Dr. Garbar for the entrance. According to the deposit of taxes available to the public at Harvard University, Dr. Garper received more than $ 1.1 million annually as compensation as a leader.
A feeling of camp solidarity in the battle of financing extends beyond Harvard. Ninety professors pledged 10 percent of wage discounts to help Harvard University, the oldest and wealthy university in the country, the Trump administration’s attack. Ryan d. Inos, a professor of government and the leader of the group, that the university expressed its gratitude.
Dr. Inus said that the group met, in realizing that some Harvard employees may be more difficult than others through federal discounts.
In a statement, the professors, who were not publicly named, said that their offer to work with less wages indicates “our commitment as faculty members to use the means at our disposal to protect the university, especially employees and students who do not have the same protection.”
