“Timebum residence” The victims request the law to protect the displaced people who have been evacuated

The residents tell of the previous evacuation of the most famous in temporary homes, running for the main and very certain bills of the work

Terment Timebomb victims in Scotland demanded that councils be taken to help people who were evacuated from dilapidated homes.

The newspaper “Daily Deldor” revealed yesterday that historical housing throughout the country faces a 10 billion pounds of reform bill.

MSP Paul Sweeney claimed that thousands of housing residents may face homelessness as councils struggle to deal with the flow of people who were evacuated from unsafe blocks.

We told us how the owner of a house of residence and Windy Murray, a room at the “Helhole” hotel after the GLASGOW City Council announced that its collection is very dangerous to live in it.

Graham Watson, 51, told a resident of the residence, how 10 people were evacuated from six apartments from an insecure bloc in Glassquez. Bridge Street A year ago.

They have endured five months of tension and anxiety, and Graham believes that a new law is needed to ensure support for home owners of condemned buildings.

He said: “This has happened again, after a year, showing that they have not learned any of the previous occasions and still do not feel any moral or civil responsibility towards people.

It was not expected that none of us returned home from working on that day without an hour.

“They told us to take what we could carry and gather in the street to tell us that we are now homeless and we must try to find a place to stay at night.

“Although I do not challenge the nature of the emergency, it is shocking that the council felt uncomfortable with helping us in the impossible situation they put us.

We are all stunned and ill. It had a great harmful effect on all of us.

“Many were forced to get out of work with stress because the council turned our lives upside down without any support or contact with them.”

Graham said that one of the neighbors did not find her cat in chaos and the council official ordered her to consider her lost because she intends to climb to the building.

He added: “The building, which is considered dangerous, did not collapse and was very strong.

“After the matter, the council confirmed that it is still very dangerous for us to return and we were excluded for another eight weeks.

“It is an indicator of chilling for the council’s commitment to the problem of the city, which has no shelter, which they can add to it without the second thinking.

“When we complained that the council rejected us and told us that they did not feel responsible. They were behaving without any feeling of accountability and it seems that there is no plan to protect the welfare of the population.”

The Council shall work under the Cry INCINA law 2003 Article 42: 1.

While this allows the legal force to evacuate real estate owners and rents, there is no ruling for them to manage or put the affected temporary.

“This seems to be an optional care duty that the Gulf Cooperation Council has not chosen. The interesting question will be the reason for this,” Graham added.

“The owners are responsible for their property. It should be understood that the population is only evacuated as a last resort when the building where they live is very dangerous,” said Glasgow’s city council spokesman.

A spokesman for the Scottish government said: “Under the 2003 building law (Scotland), building owners are responsible for preventing their buildings in a serious condition,” a Scottish government spokesman said.

“Local authorities have powers to take measures to deal with buildings that they consider dangerous or defective, including determining the most suitable path for communications based on conditions.”

Many owners of insurance companies can be rejected, as repairs are dedicated to neighboring buildings, which means that they are not covered.