Reports say the Welsh NHS “is in urgent need of transformation.”

There are “high risks” to increase the patient’s damage and the weak value of taxpayer funds if there is no “urgent improvement and transformation” in the Welsh NHS, according to a group of independent experts.

Waiting times, cancer treatment and emergency care have been cited as areas that need to be treated.

The MAG Consultative Group, which was created by Minister of Health Jeremy Miles in the fall, also wants a “new focus” on leadership and how NHS is calculated by the Wales government.

When accepting the recommendations of the report 29 either completely or partially, Miles said it contains “some difficult beating messages” but insisted that it was “mainly optimistic.”

The 68 -page report has been produced by experts who have a great experience in NHS in Wales and England.

The group led the former CEO of Operations at NHS England, Sir David Sloom, who warned Wales “starts from a difficult position.”

He said that this is due to its old residents and relatively patients, which increases health variations, “and the historically waiting lists” and a “very difficult” financial location.

He said that it was a clear performance in many areas “urgent interest” and “transformation”.

But the report insists that these improvements should not be driven by new policies or goals, but instead through “unavoidable focus” on handing over the current obligations.

The report’s recommendations revolve around:

• Sharing the best ways of work and reducing contrast between health councils

• Enhancing medical or clinical sounds within NHS and the Welsh government

• Commitment by NHS to be more transparent and “improved in public places”

• The most obvious accountability and performance management

• An additional financing from the Welsh government is conditional on performance

Sir David said if health councils can know more of each other, which can help increase performance.

“The Welsh health care system has been prepared for success, and in many places,” he added.

“But the problem is that it is going well in everything somewhere, but not everything everywhere.

“The key is how to generalize and make everyone the same standard as the best performance.”

He said that another priority is that the Welsh government to enhance its operations in maintaining NHS, describing the current control systems “complex” and “muddy”.

“We are talking about the need for a more clear and more clear framework,” he said.

“I think the clarification, sharpening it will really help, what I would like to say is other systems around the world struggling with this too. This is not a unique challenge.”

While welcoming the report of the Experts Committee, Miles admitted that he had always had always had a comfortable reading.

“There are some messages that strike difficult in the report on performance and productivity via NHS as a whole … there are some difficult messages there, but it is basically an optimistic report, because it shows a way towards the way we can get this level of performance to where we all want people to get quick access to the best possible care.”

“I think it is a good report. I welcome it. It is difficult in many parts, but it also determines, as I think, a positive way to go forward, and welcome it.”

However, the Minister of Health denied that his decision to bring external experts to make a “new perspective” in NHS performance suggested that the Welsh Labor Party government, after 26 years, ran out of ideas.

Instead, he argued that it was a sign of “a confident government in its commitment to NHS … that it is ready to look at others to help us.”

Meanwhile, the Experts Committee indicated that the great improvement should be possible in the Welsh NHS, because of its organization and some ideas that support Welsh health policy.

In this regard, the report argues, “Wales should aspire to have the leading health care system in the world.”