Music singer “Didi” faces mismanagement allegations during the first day of the United States trial Courts News

[ad_1]
A number of witnesses took the situation in the trial of Sean “Didi” Comes, who faces allegations of extortion and sex trafficking during his period as head of the entertainment empire.
A certificate began in the trial on Monday after the last stage of the jury selection and the opening statement from the lawyers. Coms, who wears a light gray jacket, presented a thumb to supporters in the courtroom in New York City in the United States.
“For 20 years, the defendant, with the help of his trusted internal circle, committed a crime after the crime,” American lawyer Emily Johnson told the court. “That’s why we are here today. This is what this issue is going on.”
A number of witnesses witnessed that they had suffered from physical violence, intimidation and manipulation by combs, while rapper’s lawyers said that he was charged with the wrong groups of crimes, his “strange gender and his preferences to sex” was photographed as a result.
Lawyer Tini Geragos told the jurors that they may end up thinking that Compass was “jerk” or “somewhat”, but it is not charged to “being or jerk.”
“This situation revolves around the volunteer options made by adults who are able to reacts,” said Geragos during its opening statement.
Johnson, the American lawyer, said that “” attacked “the women who refused to participate in the parties that were called” the seizures of the guys. “
“They will tell you about some of the most painful experiences in their lives. The days he spent in hotel rooms, high on drugs, wearing costumes to perform the sexual imaginations of the defendant,” Johnson told the victims ’certificates in the case.

“She was shaking”
The courtroom became silent with an audible voice, as a video of Kouz was shown hitting and kicking his ex -girlfriend, Cassandra Ventura, in 2016.
Daniel Philip, a dancer, witnessed that a compass had threw a bottle of wine towards Ventura before holding her hair and pulling her screaming to another room, where Philip says he heard Koms screaming and hitting Ventura.
“She literally jumped to my lap and was vibrating, literally, her entire body was shaking. She was terrified,” Philip saw Ventura.
Geragos admitted that the rains are subject to jealousy and committed a “terrible and having human violence” in the video that appears to the jurors, but it was evidence of home abuse, not sex trafficking or extortion in the middle of the case.
Prosecutors say that the compass, who faces a 15 -year minimum sentence in prison if he was convicted of all the five crimes that he acknowledged was not guilty, prompted women to engage in drug -covered parties and then blackmail them with videos of their confrontations.

Combs as a high -level artist brought great attention to trial, as well as a greater debate about the strength of numbers in sectors such as entertainment, business, sports and politics often evading accountability for abuse work.
When the case began, the jury and alternative – 12 men and six women – were sitting in the courtroom. The opening arguments began after the judge ended in explaining the law in terms of his connection with this trial, in addition to accidents such as light breakfast, which will be provided to the jury in addition to lunch.
The jury of this case is mainly unknown, which means that their identities are known to the court, prosecution and defense, but it will not be announced.
“We will keep your names and identities in confidence,” Sopramianan told jurists.
It is a common practice in federal issues to keep jury unknown, especially in sensitive matters, in which the safety of jury can be a source of concern. The names of the jury were also kept in the criminal trial of US President Donald Trump last year at the State Court in New York.
Subramanian urges jurors to judge the case only based on the evidence presented in the court. It is standard instructions, but it carries additional importance in this prominent situation, which was the subject of intense media coverage.
The judge said: “Anything I saw or heard outside the courtroom is not evidence.” “It must be ignored.”