[ad_1]
Kimi Padnosh is involved in a war of words with India on the country’s commercial deal with the United Kingdom.
The Conservative Party leader criticized the tax exemptions of Indian workers in the United Kingdom, which is a major part of the agreement in which the Kiir Starmer government mediated.
Under this arrangement, workers will be exempted from the United Kingdom from India -based companies from paying national insurance for a period of three years.
The same arrangement will be placed for British employees in India.
Badenoch described it as a “dual” tax arrangement that will harm British workers by making it cheaper than India.
but I mentioned financial times This Badnosh agreed to a similar arrangement when she was a commercial minister in the recent conservative party government, despite the lack of agreement on the final deal.
One of the Indian officials told the newspaper: “The conservatives offered us two years, but we said that it was not enough. They put it on the table. We wanted more than three, but the principle has already been waived in exchange for some giving on our aspects of the services,” one of the Indian officials told the newspaper.
Another said: “It is amazing. He was on the table when she was a commercial minister.”
In response to X, Badenoch described the story as “fake news”.
“This is the full and absolute garbage. I have never agreed on any such tax deal. The evidence cannot be more clear – I refused to sign the deal. As I always said – there is no better deal than a bad deal.”
Downting Street insisted that similar tax arrangements be included in the United Kingdom’s commercial deals with about 50 other countries.
Despite the class, Badenoch did not raise the case in the prime minister’s questions today.
“Kimi Padnosh has been arrested by her hypocrisy again. She says something but she did something else,” said a Labor spokeswoman.
“Instead of gathering behind the largest commercial deal since Britain’s exit from the European Union, it is desperate to criticize the government that it attacked.
“Its style is to put the party in front of the country, so it is no wonder that it fails to submit an agreement that would provide an annual batch of 4.8 billion pounds to British companies, create more jobs, and raise wages by more than two billion pounds annually, which reduces the prices of consumers who suffer from severe pressure.”
