“Keir Starmer’s Kyardice made the Labor Party for no one”

When the Labor Party was created 125 years ago, this was done due to the request from the actress actress an incomplete representation in society, routinely by a contradictory institution, to hear their voices.

It was crowded in the corridors that were now moved in the collective souvenir hall on Farrinjdoun Street, London, a selective group of left -wing groups, socialist movements, and unions that have set aside differences often that often stopped the progressive organization, and in February 1900, the “LIC representation committee” established. They literally brought the twentieth century and the conscious issues of the layer that will determine it, to Britain.

It was not until the end of World War I in 1918 that the political movement, which is now officially called the Labor Party, gained its first taste to power. The veterans of the war, who came out of the undesirable trenches, wondered about what their suffering achieved and looked at the policies of the distinguished labor party of democratic freedoms led by the state as a means of the change they fought for, and reached its peak in the first party government in 1924.

The rise of the Labor Party to the popularity, overcoming the dissolved liberal party as the main opposition of the conservatives, was secured in part because its members filled the vacuum of economic and social issues in Britain with their leftist beliefs. They became an answer to a question that the British public was screaming for years.

Saying that things have changed since then will be very low that you can see from space. The Modern Labor Party, through political transformations and turns during the last century and a quarter, has become a peel of its previous ones, teeming with opportunists who taste the body of a party that was one day for something.

Yes, I am talking about Care Starmer.

Nobody knows what Care Starmer thinks. This is not just a column, either. Yougov statistics from April prove that the majority of the British public (60 percent) have no idea at all about what Keir Starmer represents. It often seems that members of his political party rarely know what their leader will say when he stands in the rumors or takes the podium in 10th.

Since becoming prime minister, many Sir Kiir’s positions, who claimed to have been firm since he became a leader in work in 2020, has faded into the speed of Breakneck. Its immigration policies seem to have been chosen from Playbook Tory, and his budget decisions fully fly against a 2024 statement, and it still seems that the work does not have an answer to NHS problems.

Then there is his treatment of LGBTQ+issues. This one makes my blood boil, because I was there. I was there during the 2022 PinkNews Awards ceremony when Starmer was on the threshold of success amid Liz Tusss leadership failures and ultimately leaving, treating the conservative government for converting people. I was there in the showrooms at the church’s home in Westminster, where he honored the life of the late human rights lawyer, Jonathan Cooper Obi, after his death in 2021, and praised him as a “justice” force between gay+ people.

What an insult to Cooper’s heritage of tireless activity, your subsequent political profession, Sir Kiir. What a coward person since I saw you standing with us proudly on this platform. What a fool, I believed that you had already given a curse on people’s transit rights.

Through this endless curvature, Starmer and Chums politically assisted in converting the Labor Party into a party that was one day standing for something to a party that is desperately looking for approval; He behaves as if he is not really in power.

You only need to look at his statement on the UK Supreme Court ruling regarding the introduction of the 2010 Women’s Equality Law to know the destruction of the policy of implementation. Starmer’s statement that he no longer believes that women are real women who were not literally liked by anyone. Progressive activists saw a nail in the coffin for any hope that the Labor Party will escape TERF chains wrapped around its neck, and the anti -strike activists drained as very few, very late.

Here, Care Starmer, left for the soup in Consequences From his failed tactics to correspond to everything he believes that the audience is thinking about it, as if he believed that a man of people means to follow them blindly wherever they went – even off the shelf.

Young, ambitious politicians will take the prime minister of Mr. Kerr Starmer as a severe warning to the purpose of politicians in liberal democracy like us. In job democracy, politicians should be elected to work as representatives of people who can make pivotal political decisions. This means that they should listen to the audience while maintaining the commitment to the promises they made, which prompted their election.

If politicians depend only on their decisions on public opinion, the central legislative changes that formed our society had not been brought in. We still have apartheid and death penalty, and in fact, a ban on homosexuality in Britain.

The commitment of all the Labor Party to follow what they believe that the public has done has made it the cheese party, and this is in the end a party that does not represent anyone.