A ban on chicken to protect farmers, but it is also protected by consumers in the United Kingdom United States news
[ad_1]
Why was there such a flap of chicken?
In American infiltrators, it is a standard practice designed to reduce bacteria levels such as Salmonella And Campylobacter – the main source of diseases transmitted by food in the United States, as well as here in the United Kingdom.
Washing chlorine itself is not the problem. Several studies have shown that small amounts of chlorine on meat do not pose any health risk, and we consume much more in our tap water more every day than we will get from eating it.
Instead, the argument behind Labor on chlorine Here in the United Kingdom and Europe is that it can cover bad hygiene standards during raising or slaughtering chicken.
Read more:
The United Kingdom and the United States announce a commercial deal to save thousands of British jobs
What can be in a commercial deal in the United Kingdom?
Please use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video operator
What can the commercial deal for the United States of America mean?
During commercial negotiations, the United States has long argued that it was just an excuse for a protectionist – a reason to maintain the cheapest US chicken from supermarkets and British restaurants.
But the main cause of American chicken is cheaper than animal care standards.
In the UK, for example, there are legal limits on the number of birds that can be crammed into a shed.
In the United States, there is no – at least at least.
The same applies to lighting materials and bedding, as well as a happy chicken key.
With high storage density, low costs for lighting, bedding and the ability to use antibiotics to increase growth – prohibited here in the UK – large chicken in America can produce more meat at a much lower cost.
Read more from Sky News:
Trump and Sarmer are telling the Sky News Trade deal in the United Kingdom is just the beginning
The United Kingdom in “active discussions” with Washington on the tariff of American films
Ban on the chicken, kept a less profitable chicken than the United Kingdom for decades.
The United States and the market activists in the free market are not mistaken: it has protected our farmers from competition.
But he also protects consumers in the UK – most of them care about the lives of the animals they eat.
