[ad_1]
Justin Balouni to Blake Livly
In any way, this has ended, the first amendment says that !!!
Published
Justin Balouni Class again in Blake BlakeTrying to obtain a lawsuit against her from the court, while accusing her again of trying to destroy his career, according to the new court documents.
Baldouni submitted his response to Blake’s request to reject a lawsuit in the Federal Court – while giving several reasons for not allowing the representative to the actress for the hook.
In the documents, he is accused of curse Blake of coordination, participating in a campaign to distort and direct it “designed to destroy the reputation and professions of the road parties.”
Baldoni is the co -founder of Wayfarer Studios, which produced “It ends with us”, starring Blake and Justin, which also directed the movie. As you know, filming the film ended in a bad conflict that reached his head when Blake filed a lawsuit against Justin, accusing him of sexual harassment and engineering a campaign against her.
Justin filed his own lawsuit against Blake, her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and the New York Times, claiming that Blake ordered her staining campaign with the help of an article in the New York Times.
In his last file, he says, “There is sufficient evidence for that [Lively] He took an official role in publishing both the alleged defamation data by approval or declaring it before publishing. “
It also indicates that “Livley” told the New York Tate newspaper a false and fun story about a sabotage of malicious public relations that was published as a revenge force for sexual harassment complaints, knowing that the newspaper publishes that wrong story[.]”
I continued to tell other reasons that the judge must deny the Brick’s suggestion, including that she acted from slag.
Baldouni lawyer, Brian Friedman, tells TMZ, “Mrs. Livly and her circle from the Hollywood elite cannot prevent my client from exercising their constitutional right to seek the court to purify their names from her wrong and harmful claims.”
Friedman continued, “What Mrs. Livly is trying to do is a dangerous precedent by preventing the court’s doors to my customers and punishing them to spend their day in the court, and it is a protected right through the first amendment. This right protects not only the master of the authority and the road parties in this particular case, but all Americans in the future who carry them against them from the judge.
Friedman concluded by saying … “This must stop here, and we will continue to fight this bright attempt to prevent access to the court system and weaken our nation’s constitution to serve those who are in the status of power.”
